June 13, 2012

Fake wedding ring at job interview a bad idea

• Post a comment |
• E-mail |
• Print
• • Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

By Karla L. Miller / Special to The Washington Post
Q: I was thinking about wearing a wedding ring to my next job interview in order to appear less as a loser and more as a connected adult who can maintain long-term relationships.

I am 51 and have never been married or in a relationship of any kind. What are your thoughts on this?

A: Let's not soft-pedal it: You would be caught in a blatant deception (see note below). Fortunately, prudent employers steer clear of questions about marital status, so it's unlikely you would be busted during the interview.

And unless you're auditioning for "The Bachelor," I sincerely doubt the hiring decision would hinge on whether you're hitched. Even if it did, the door could swing either way. While one manager might see married people as more stable and mature — cue collective snort from anyone familiar with the institution — another might assume their personal entanglements would make them less dedicated to the job.

I'd be more concerned about what would happen once you landed the job. If a ring would make enough of a difference to get you hired, its absence later would surely be questioned. Would you keep wearing it? What if you met a legitimate romantic prospect through the new job? Your connubial contrivance could raise more questions about your character than your actual history does.

Believe me, I know what it's like to feel treated as less than half of an entity. But have you truly never been in a relationship of any kind? What about friends? Family? Colleagues? Fellow hobbyists? Is there no one whose company you've enjoyed for years, even if you haven't seen each other naked? Those relationships count, the same way volunteer work counts as experience — you're just not bound to them by vows or a paycheck.

Instead of jewelry shopping, spend your time and money with friends or a professional who can help you see yourself not as a lonesome loser but as a singular sensation who would be an asset to any workplace.

Note: I can already feel the flames: "How dare you slam someone for pretending to be married when you condoned hiding pregnancy in an earlier column?" There's a difference between not volunteering private facts that could expose you to illegal bias and implicitly lying about your marital status to gain questionable advantage in a job hunt. The latter is akin to listing on your resume a club you don't belong to, or donning a fake pregnancy belly in the hope that it makes you look like the nurturing type.

Submit questions to Karla L. Miller at wpmagazine@washingtonpost.com.

• Post a comment |
• E-mail |
• Print
• • Share:
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  
  •  

Read more
Resumes and Job Hunt, ethics, featured, interviewing

0 Comments

Leave a comment

* required field

Your name: *

E-mail address: (Will not be displayed)

Your comment: *

Captcha:

Type the characters you see in the picture above.